Benton Housing Associates Limited Partnership v. Benton Arkansas, City of et al
| Benton Housing Associates Limited Partnership |
| Benton, City of, Arkansas, John Does and Benton Arkansas, City of |
| 4:2021cv01136 |
| November 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| James M Moody |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 and #3 motions to admit counsel pro hac vice on behalf of Plaintiffs; and admitting A. Wayne Billings and Mark K. Stonecipher to appear before this Court as co-counsel of record in this action. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 12/20/2021. (llg)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear pro hac vice by Mark K. Stonecipher. Fee $100 receipt number AAREDC-4168254. Filed by All Plaintiffs (Stone, Clayborne) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Appear pro hac vice by A. Wayne Billings. Fee $100 receipt number AAREDC-4168246. Filed by All Plaintiffs (Stone, Clayborne) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Benton Housing Associates Limited Partnership. Summons issued and returned to counsel. (Fee of $402 paid. Receipt Number LIT084551.) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jbh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
