Holly v. Hampton
Plaintiff: Jason Holly
Defendant: Doe and Josh Hampton
Case Number: 4:2021cv01151
Filed: November 23, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: Jerome T Kearney
Referring Judge: James M Moody
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 12, 2022 Filing 10 APPELLATE FILING FEE NOTICE to Plaintiff. (ldb)
January 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 JUDGMENT: Pursuant to #8 Order, judgment is entered dismissing this case without prejudice; the relief sought is denied. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 1/12/2022. (ldb)
January 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER approving and adopting #4 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition; and dismissing this action without prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 1/12/2022. (ldb)
December 23, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE to the Court by Jason Holly. (kdr)
December 13, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE by Jason Holly. (llg)
December 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #1 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis; directing monthly payments be made from Plaintiff's prison trust account for the $350 filing fee; and directing the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to the Administrator of the Lincoln County Detention Center. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 12/1/2021. (ldb)
December 1, 2021 Filing 4 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that this #2 action be DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. Objections are due no later than 14 days from the date of the findings and recommendations. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 12/1/2021. (lmc)
November 30, 2021 NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #2 Complain. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified to correct the party name and description as, "COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Josh Hampton filed by Jason Holly" as indicated by the document. (cmn)
November 23, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #2 Complaint. CORRECTION: The original document was attached in error (wrong image file) due to a clerical mistake by the Clerk's office. The correct document was added to docket entry #2 and is attached hereto for review by the parties. (jak)
November 23, 2021 Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Doe filed by Jason Holly. (llg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/23/2021: #1 Main Document - Correct) (jak).
November 23, 2021 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jason Holly. (llg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Holly v. Hampton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jason Holly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Josh Hampton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?