Dickerson v. Lingo et al
| Shelton Dickerson |
| Jason Lingo, Douglas Hewitt and Chad Wooly |
| 4:2021cv01178 |
| December 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Edie R Ervin |
| Lee P Rudofsky |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Shelton Dickerson re #3 Recommended Disposition. (fjg) |
Filing 3
RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION recommending #1 the claims of Mr. Dickerson's be dismissed, without prejudice, based on his failure to: (1) respond to the Court's 12/6/2021 Order; (2) submit a completed IFP form or pay the filing fee; and (3) prosecute this lawsuit. Objections due within 14 days of the date of this Recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin on 1/12/2022. (kdr)
|
|
Filing 2
INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER-PLAINTIFFS directing the Clerk to enclose a new IFP application along with a copy of this Order; and directing Plaintiff to return a complete IFP application, including an accompanying affidavit and jail account information sheet, or pay the $402.00 filing fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin on 12/6/2021. (jbh)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Shelton Dickerson.(kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
