Laster et al v. Taylor 4 Delivery Inc et al
Plaintiff: Andre Laster, Aaron Thomas and Tyrus Lamont Boone
Defendant: Taylor 4 Delivery, Israel Taylor and Taylor 4 Delivery Inc
Case Number: 4:2021cv01209
Filed: December 16, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: Billy Roy Wilson
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 8, 2022 Filing 5 Deficiency Letter from Clerk of Court notifying party that #4 Consent to Join Collective Action lacks a correct case number (Local Rule 5.5(a)). (jak)
February 2, 2022 Filing 4 CONSENT To Join Collective Action filed by Andre Laster as to Andre Laster, Aaron Thomas and Tyrus Lamont Boone. (Hamlet, Lydia)
January 13, 2022 Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Aaron Thomas, Andre Laster, Tyrus Lamont Boone. Israel Taylor served on 1/9/2022. (Sanford, Joshua)
January 13, 2022 Filing 2 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Aaron Thomas, Andre Laster, Tyrus Lamont Boone. Taylor 4 Delivery Inc served on 1/9/2022. (Sanford, Joshua)
December 16, 2021 Filing 1 ORIGINAL COMPLAINT - COLLECTIVE ACTION against All Defendants, filed by Aaron Thomas, Andre Laster, Tyrus Lamont Boone. Summons issued and returned to counsel. (Fee of $402 paid. Receipt Number LIT084904.) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jbh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Laster et al v. Taylor 4 Delivery Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andre Laster
Represented By: Joshua Sanford
Represented By: Lydia Hicks Hamlet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Aaron Thomas
Represented By: Joshua Sanford
Represented By: Lydia Hicks Hamlet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tyrus Lamont Boone
Represented By: Joshua Sanford
Represented By: Lydia Hicks Hamlet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Taylor 4 Delivery
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Israel Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Taylor 4 Delivery Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?