Eddington v. Social Security Administration
| Carl Eddington |
| Social Security Administration |
| 4:2021cv01221 |
| December 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Jerome T Kearney |
| Billy Roy Wilson |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Carl Eddington. Social Security Administration - Office of General Counsel served on 2/16/2022. (Baltz, Randolph) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Rory Linerud on behalf of Carl Eddington (Linerud, Rory) |
Filing 6
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER finding as moot #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff's amended motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, making this motion moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 01/25/2022. (get)
|
|
Filing 5
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #4 Motion to Amend/Correct. Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is GRANTED. Plaintiff may proceed without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor. The Clerk is directed to issue summons to counsel for service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 01/25/2022. (get)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Amend #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Carl Eddington (Baltz, Randolph) (Docket text modified on 1/25/2022 to establish linkage)(jak) |
| Summons Issued as to Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General and returned to counsel for service. (ldb) |
| NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #4 MOTION to Amend. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified to establish linkage to #1 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis as marked on the document. (jak) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: The Court hereby directs Plaintiff to provide within 30 days of this Order some explanation as to any source(s) of #1 income and/or means of support. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 12/27/2021. (lmc)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration filed by Carl Eddington. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (llg) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Carl Eddington. (llg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Eddington v. Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Carl Eddington | |
| Represented By: | Randolph M. Baltz |
| Represented By: | Rory Linerud |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Stacey Elise McCord |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
