PS Products Inc et al v. Cutting Edge Products Inc
| PS Products Inc and Billy Pennington |
| Cutting Edge Products Inc doing business as www.cuttingedgeproducts.com |
| 4:2022cv00035 |
| January 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Billy Roy Wilson |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #3 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer All Defendants. The answer to the complaint is due on or before 2:00PM, April 30, 2022. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 3/11/22. (mmb)
|
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint , filed by PS Products Inc, Billy Pennington. Cutting Edge Products Inc served on 2/23/2022. (Stewart, Chris) |
| Filing 3 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by All Plaintiffs (Stewart, Chris) |
| Filing 2 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding a Patent or Trademark submitted by the Clerk's Office to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on 1/20/2022. (cdw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Cutting Edge Products Inc, filed by PS Products Inc, Billy Pennington. Summons issued and returned to counsel for service. (Fee of $402 paid. Receipt Number LIT085250.) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jbh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
