Johnson v. Gober et al
Travis Johnson |
Mark Gober and Rick Harvey |
4:2022cv00054 |
January 20, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Lee P Rudofsky |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 EVIDENCE by Travis Johnson. (ldb) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Order by Travis Johnson. (llg) |
Filing 7 ORDER ordering that this case be administratively terminated; granting #1 In Forma Pauperis Application; directing monthly payments be made from Plaintiff's prison trust account for the $350 filing fee; directing the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this Order to the Administrator of the Drew County Detention Center; denying #4 motion for order; granting #3 , #5 motions for a status update; and directing the Clerk to send Mr. Johnson a copy of the docket sheet along with this order. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 2/28/2022. (ldb) |
Filing 6 EVIDENCE by Travis Johnson. (llg) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Status Update by Travis Johnson. (ldb) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Order by Travis Johnson. (llg) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Status Update by Travis Johnson. (kdr)(Docket text modified on 2/7/2022 to correct a typographical error)(jak) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Travis Johnson. (llg) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Travis Johnson. (llg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.