Meyers v. Autodesk Inc
| Kendall Meyers |
| Autodesk Inc |
| 4:2022cv00074 |
| January 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Lee P Rudofsky |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #2 Complaint by Autodesk Inc (Hodges, M.) |
Filing 12
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to #2 Complaint. Answer due by 3/25/2022. No further extensions. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 3/17/2022. (hml)
|
| Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #2 Complaint or Otherwise Plead by Autodesk Inc (Hodges, M.) |
|
Filing 10
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to #2 Complaint. Answer due by 3/18/2022. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 3/14/2022. (hml)
|
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #2 Complaint or Otherwise Plead by Autodesk Inc (Hodges, M.) |
|
Filing 8
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #7 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to #2 Complaint. Answer due 3/11/2022. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 3/7/2022. (hml)
|
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #2 Complaint by Autodesk Inc (Hodges, M.) |
|
Filing 6
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer to #2 Complaint. Answer due 3/3/2022. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 2/22/2022. (hml)
|
| Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #2 Complaint by Autodesk Inc (Hodges, M.) |
|
Filing 4
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #3 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer to #2 Complaint. Answer due 2/17/2022. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 2/7/2022. (hml)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #2 Complaint or Otherwise Plead by Autodesk Inc (Hodges, M.) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Kendall Meyers against Autodesk Inc. (ldb) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Autodesk Inc from Faulkner County Circuit Court, case number 23CV-21-1401. Fee of $402 paid, receipt number LIT085369. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (ldb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Meyers v. Autodesk Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kendall Meyers | |
| Represented By: | Tabatha Branch |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Autodesk Inc | |
| Represented By: | M. Kimberly Hodges |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
