Francis v. Gamdan Services LLC et al
Plaintiff: Taylor Francis
Defendant: Gamdan Services LLC, Gamdan Fadah and Adnan Fadah
Case Number: 4:2022cv00094
Filed: February 2, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: Billy Roy Wilson
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by Adnan Fadah, Gamdan Fadah, Gamdan Services LLC (Calvert, Sarah)
March 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Defendants' ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Adnan Fadah, Gamdan Fadah, Gamdan Services LLC.(Calvert, Sarah)
March 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Conference to occur by 5/16/2022. Rule 26(f) Report due by 5/31/2022. Bench Trial set for 3/7/2023 at 9:30 AM in Little Rock Courtroom # A401 before Judge Billy Roy Wilson. Entered at the direction of the Court on 3/8/22. (mmb)
March 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #2 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer- Gamdan Fadah and Gamdan Services LLC answer due 3/24/2022. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 3/8/22. (mmb)
March 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by E. B. Chiles, IV on behalf of Gamdan Fadah, Gamdan Services LLC (Chiles, E.)
March 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint , MOTION for Extension of Time to File , MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply () by Gamdan Fadah, Gamdan Services LLC (Calvert, Sarah)
February 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Taylor Francis. Summons issued and returned to counsel. (Fee of $402 paid. Receipt Number LIT085456.) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jbh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Francis v. Gamdan Services LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Taylor Francis
Represented By: Joshua Sanford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gamdan Services LLC
Represented By: E. B. Chiles, IV
Represented By: Sarah Katherine Calvert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gamdan Fadah
Represented By: E. B. Chiles, IV
Represented By: Sarah Katherine Calvert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Adnan Fadah
Represented By: Sarah Katherine Calvert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?