Heard v. eStem Jr High et al
| Tamara Heard |
| eStem Jr High, John Bacon and Justin Adams |
| 4:2022cv00124 |
| February 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| James M Moody |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Justin Adams, John Bacon, eStem Jr High. (Kaemmerling, Michelle) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Michelle Marie Kaemmerling on behalf of Justin Adams, John Bacon, eStem Jr High (Kaemmerling, Michelle) |
Filing 4
ORDER granting #1 Heard's motion to proceed in forma pauperis; directing Heard to file an Amended complaint within 30 days or risk dismissal of this case without prejudice; and directing Heard to be familiar and comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as well as the Local Rules of this Court. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 02/25/2022. (llg)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER provisionally granting #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, pursuant to General Order No. 29. Signed at the Direction of the Court on 02/09/2022. (llg)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Tamara Heard. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (llg) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tamara Heard. (llg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
