Thomas v. Volkman et al
| David Thomas |
| Volkman, J Lingo, Ryals, Douglas Volkman and Jason Lingo |
| 4:2022cv00151 |
| February 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Jerome T Kearney |
| Billy Roy Wilson |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: The parties shall complete discovery on or before 09/23/2022 and file any dispositive motions on or before 10/24/2022. A Motion based on failure to exhaust must be filed by 05/23/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 03/25/2022. (lmc)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER directing the Clerk of the Court to change the style of the case to reflect the correct names of Defendants Douglas Volkman and Jason Lingo. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 03/25/2022. (llg)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE, CONSENT AND REFERENCE to a Magistrate Judge forwarded by the Clerk of Court to the parties. (lmc)
|
|
Filing 9
ANSWER to #2 Complaint by J Lingo, Volkman.(Lewis, Kaylen)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER approving and adopting in their entirety #3 Proposed Findings and Recommendations; dismissing without prejudice Plaintiff's official capacity claims for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted; dismissing without prejudice Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Ryals for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted; dismissing Defendant Ryals as a party to this action; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from any Order adopting these recommendations would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 3/10/2022. (ldb)
|
|
Filing 7
SUMMONS Returned Executed. J Lingo served on 3/3/2022. (kth)
|
|
Filing 6
SUMMONS Returned Executed. Volkman served on 3/3/2022. (kth)
|
|
Summons Issued as to J Lingo, Volkman; and forwarded to U.S. Marshal for service. (ldb)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #1 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; directing monthly payments be made from Plaintiff's prison trust account for the $350 filing fee; directing the Clerk of the Court to prepare Summonses for Volkman and J. Lingo; and directing the U.S. Marshal to serve a copy of the #2 Complaint, Summons, and this Order on Defendants Volkman and Lingo without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefore. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 2/18/2022. (ldb)
|
|
Filing 4
INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONERS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 2/18/2022. (ldb)
|
|
Filing 3
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that Plaintiff's official capacity claims be dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted; Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Ryals be dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted; Defendant Ryals be dismissed as a party to this action; and that the Court certify that an in forma pauperis appeal from any Order adopting these recommendations would not be taken in good faith. Objections due no later than 14 days from the date of the findings and recommendations. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 2/18/2022. (ldb)
|
|
Filing 2
COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by David Thomas. (llg)
|
|
Filing 1
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by David Thomas. (llg)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
