Williams v. Phillips et al
| Byron A Williams |
| Jeff Phillips, Seth Bradley and Heather Patton |
| 4:2022cv00226 |
| March 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Lee P Rudofsky |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 APPELLATE FILING FEE NOTICE to Plaintiff. (ldb) |
Filing 4
JUDGMENT: Consistent with #3 Order, this case is hereby dismissed without prejudice. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 3/30/2022. (ldb)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #1 In Forma Pauperis Application; directing monthly payments be made from Plaintiff's prison trust account for the $350 filing fee; dismissing without prejudice #2 Complaint; declining to exercise jurisdiction to the extent Mr. Williams alleges any state law malicious prosecution claim; recommending that this dismissal count as a "strike"; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 3/30/2022. (ldb)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Byron A Williams. (llg) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Byron A Williams. (llg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
