Robertson v. Arkansas Department of Community Correction et al
| Khalid Robertson and Khalid K Robertson |
| Arkansas Department of Community Correction, Ashley Monk, Emme Branch and Joe Page |
| 4:2022cv00239 |
| March 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Jerome T Kearney |
| Lee P Rudofsky |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER denying #4 Plaintiff's Motion for Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 03/31/2022. (lmc)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Order by Khalid K Robertson. (kdr) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER denying without prejudice #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; and directing the Plaintiff to submit either the $402 statutory filing fee or a completed in forma pauperis application, with the required calculation sheet signed by an authorized official of the incarcerating facility, within 30 days of the entry date of this Order; and directing the Clerk to send to Plaintiff an in forma pauperis application, including certificate and calculation sheet. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 3/16/2022. (ldb)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Khalid K Robertson.(kdr) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Khalid Robertson. (kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
