Robertson et al v. Family Dollar Stores of Arkansas LLC et al
| Randall Robertson and Julian A Graves |
| Family Dollar Stores of Arkansas LLC and Family Dollar Services LLC |
| 4:2022cv00269 |
| March 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Brian S Miller |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #12 Defendants' unopposed motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise respond to Randall Robertson's class action complaint. Defendants must answer or otherwise respond to Sharp's complaint within 45 days after the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation issues an order on the pending motion for transfer and coordination or consolidation. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 5/13/2022. (kdr)
|
| Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #2 Complaint by All Defendants (Campbell, Katherine) |
|
Filing 11
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #7 , #8 , #9 and #10 motions to appear pro hac vice for plaintiffs filed by J. Gerard Stranch IV, Janna Maples, Benjamin A. Gastel, and Michael G. Stewart. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 4/11/2022. (ljb)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Appear pro hac vice by Michael G. Stewart. Fee $100 receipt number AAREDC-4241790. Filed by All Plaintiffs (Attachments: #1 Document Fed COGS, #2 Document State COGS)(Streett, James) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Appear pro hac vice by Benjamin A. Gastel. Fee $100 receipt number AAREDC-4241785. Filed by All Plaintiffs (Attachments: #1 Document Fed COGS, #2 Document State COGS)(Streett, James) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Appear pro hac vice by Janna Maples. Fee $100 receipt number AAREDC-4241781. Filed by All Plaintiffs (Attachments: #1 Document Fed COGS, #2 Document State COGS)(Streett, James) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Appear pro hac vice by J. Gerard Stranch, IV. Fee $100 receipt number AAREDC-4241754. Filed by All Plaintiffs (Attachments: #1 Document Fed COGS, #2 Document State COGS)(Streett, James) |
|
Filing 6
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #3 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Answers due 5/16/2022. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 3/30/2022. (rmg)
|
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by Family Dollar Services LLC, Family Dollar Stores of Arkansas LLC (Campbell, Katherine) |
| Filing 4 Deficiency Letter from Clerk of Court re #1 Notice of Removal notifying party that a Corporate Disclosure Statement was not filed with first appearance, pleading, petition, motion response, or other request (F.R.Cv.P. 7.1). (cmn) |
| Filing 3 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #2 Complaint by Family Dollar Services LLC, Family Dollar Stores of Arkansas LLC (Ney, Marshall) |
| Filing 2 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Julian A Graves and Randall Robertson.(kdr) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Family Dollar Services LLC and Family Dollar Stores of Arkansas LLC from Pope County Circuit Court, Case Number 58CV-22-85. Filing Fee of $402 paid. Receipt Number LIT086091. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
