Galbreath v. Payne
| Haley Galbreath |
| Wendy Kelley and Dexter Payne |
| 4:2022cv00284 |
| March 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Edie R Ervin |
| Billy Roy Wilson |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
ORDER directing the Petitioner to file an amended petition, using Form AO 241, and limit her habeas claims to the judgment(s) of one state court, on or before 6/9/2022, if she wishes to continue with this action; directing the Petitioner to file a separate habeas action, using Form AO 241, if she wishes to pursue habeas relief with respect to the judgment(s) of an additional state court; directing the Clerk of Court to mail Petitioner's attorney 2 copies of the form for 2254 petitions (Form AO 241); and directing the Clerk of Court to change the name of Respondent to Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction. Service of the Petition is not currently appropriate. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin on 5/9/2022. (ldb)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Memorandum In Support filed by Haley Galbreath.(Fee of $5 paid, receipt #JON001066.) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(wbb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
