Austin v. Gober et al
| Donna K Austin |
| Mark Gober and Susan Potts |
| 4:2022cv00300 |
| April 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Patricia S Harris |
| James M Moody |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER denying #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. See Doc. No. #3 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 4/8/2022. (cfd)
|
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Donna K Austin. (llg) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Donna K Austin. (llg) |
|
Filing 3
INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER PLAINTIFFS granting #1 IFP motion; directing monthly payments be made from Plaintiff's institutional account for the $350 filing fee; directing the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to the Drew County Sheriff and a blank 1983 complaint form to Austin; and directing Austin to amend her complaint to provide enough information to allow the Court to screen her claims within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 04/04/2022. (llg)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Donna K Austin. (ldb) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Donna K Austin. (ldb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
