Dvorak v. Social Security Administration
| Ernest Dvorak and Ernest R Dvorak |
| Social Security Administration |
| 4:2022cv00412 |
| May 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Patricia S Harris |
| Billy Roy Wilson |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 Review of HHS Decision |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #1 application to proceed in forma pauperis. The applicant may proceed without prepayment of fees and costs or the necessity of giving security therefor. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 05/23/2022. (llg)
|
|
Summons Issued as to Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General and forwarded to counsel for service. (llg)
|
|
NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #1 Motion and #2 Complaint. CORRECTION: The docket entries were modified to correct the party name as "Ernest R Dvorak" as indicated by the document.(cmn)
|
|
Filing 2
COMPLAINT filed by Ernest R Dvorak against Social Security Administration. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (ldb) (Docket text modified on 5/10/2022 to correct party name.) (cmn)
|
|
Filing 1
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ernest R Dvorak. (ldb)(Docket text modified on 5/10/2022 to correct party name.)(cmn)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
