Williams v. Qualls et al
| Joshua Milik Williams |
| Brit Qualls, Lot Rolfe, Bret Qualls and Lott Rolfe |
| 4:2022cv00423 |
| May 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Lee P Rudofsky |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 APPELLATE FILING FEE NOTICE to Plaintiff. (ldb) |
Filing 4
JUDGMENT: Consistent with #3 Order, this case is hereby dismissed without prejudice. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal of this Judgment and the accompanying Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 6/7/2022. (ldb)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #1 In Forma Pauperis Application; directing monthly payments be made from Plaintiff's prison trust account for the $350 filing fee; directing the Clerk of the Court to correct the spelling of both Mr. Qualls's and Mr. Rolfe's names on the docket sheet; dismissing without prejudice #2 Complaint; recommending that dismissal count as a "strike"; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal of this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 6/7/2022. (ldb)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Joshua Milik Williams. (llg) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Joshua Milik Williams. (llg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
