Young v. Maples Insurance Agency LLC et al
Jennifer Young |
Maples Insurance Agency LLC, Garry D Jones Insurance Inc and Murray David Maples, III |
4:2022cv00467 |
May 20, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Kristine G Baker |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by Garry D Jones Insurance Inc, Murray David Maples, III, Maples Insurance Agency LLC (Young, Perry) |
Filing 6 Deficiency Letter from Clerk of Court re #5 Answer notifying party that a Corporate Disclosure Statement was not filed with first appearance, pleading, petition, motion response, or other request (F.R.Cv.P. 7.1).(jak) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Garry D Jones Insurance Inc, Murray David Maples, III, Maples Insurance Agency LLC.(Young, Perry) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jennifer Young. Murray David Maples, III served on 6/6/2022. (Sanford, Joshua) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jennifer Young. Garry D Jones Insurance Inc served on 6/6/2022. (Sanford, Joshua) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jennifer Young. Maples Insurance Agency LLC served on 6/6/2022. (Sanford, Joshua) |
NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #1 Complaint. CORRECTION: The docket entry was modified to correct the date filed as 5/20/2022 as indicated by the document. (cmn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.