Kiesling v. USA et al
| Ruby Christine Kiesling |
| USA, Global Logistics Corporation, Department of Defense, Defense Logistics Agency and Does |
| 4:2022cv00570 |
| June 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| D P Marshall |
| Billy Roy Wilson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Other Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Ruby Christine Kiesling re #3 Order, 4 Text Entry Only Notice of Reassignment, #5 Order. (fjg) |
Filing 5
ORDER dismissing this case; finding as moot #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; and directing the Clerk of the Court to reject future cases by Ms. Kiesling containing similar allegations unless she pays the filing fee. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 6/28/2022. (ldb)
|
| Filing 4 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT. Pursuant to #3 Order, the Clerk's office has reassigned the case to Judge Billy Roy Wilson. (jak) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER transferring this case to Judge Wilson. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 6/27/2022. (jak)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT filed by Ruby Christine Kiesling against All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (ldb) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ruby Christine Kiesling. (ldb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
