Smith v. Dennis
| James Elwood Smith |
| Jodi Raines Dennis |
| 4:2022cv00635 |
| July 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| James M Moody |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 APPELLATE FILING FEE NOTICE to Plaintiff. (llg) |
Filing 8
JUDGMENT: Consistent with #7 Order that was entered on this day, this case is hereby dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 07/25/2022. (llg)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Smith's motion to proceed in forma pauperis; directing monthly payments be made from Plaintiff's prison trust account for the $350 filing fee; directing the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to the Warden of the Ouachita Unit, the ADC Trust Fund Centralized Banking Office, and the ADC Compliance Office; dismissing Smith's claims without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; certifying, an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith; and recommending this dismissal constitute a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 07/25/2022. (llg)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by James Elwood Smith. (llg) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER denying, without prejudice, #2 Plaintiff James Elwood Smith's motion to proceed in forma pauperis; directing the Clerk to send Smith an IFP application, including calculation sheet; and directing Smith to either pay the $402 filing and administrative fee, or file a complete IFP application, including a signed certificate and calculation sheet within 30 days from the date of this Order if he wishes to proceed with this case. If he does not do so, his case will be dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 07/12/2022. (llg)
|
| Filing 4 Case electronically transferred in from the U.S. District Court, Western District of Arkansas; Case Number 5:22-cv-05135. Electronic file copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
|
Filing 3
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the Eastern District of Arkansas. Docket Sheet and case documents sent to receiving court. Signed by Honorable Christy D. Comstock on July 11, 2022. (bjb) [Transferred from arwd on 7/11/2022.]
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (42:1983) by James Elwood Smith. Motions referred to Christy D. Comstock.(bjb) [Transferred from arwd on 7/11/2022.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT REFERRED (42:1983) against Judge Jodi Raines Dennis, filed by James Elwood Smith.(bjb) [Transferred from arwd on 7/11/2022.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Smith v. Dennis | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: James Elwood Smith | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Jodi Raines Dennis | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
