James v. Boot Barn Inc
| Cody James |
| Boot Barn Inc |
| 4:2022cv00646 |
| July 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Kristine G Baker |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Boot Barn Inc.(Gohn, Thomas) |
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 motion for admission pro hac vice of Jason W. Cook. Mr. Cook shall appear as counsel of record for Boot Barn, Inc. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 8/18/2022. (jbh)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Appear pro hac vice by Jason W. Cook. Fee $100 receipt number AAREDC-4329819. Filed by Boot Barn Inc (Griffin, William) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #4 motion for extension of time to file answer or responsive pleading. Boot Barn shall have up to and including 9/8/2022, to respond to the complaint. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 8/8/2022. (jbh)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #5 , #6 , #7 motions for admission pro hac vice of Ms. DeFord, Ms. Wheatley, and Mr. Gohn pursuant to Local Rule 83.5(d). They shall appear as counsel of record for Boot Barn, Inc. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 8/8/2022. (jbh)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Appear pro hac vice by Thomas J. Gohn. Fee $100 receipt number AAREDC-4322058. Filed by Boot Barn Inc (Griffin, William) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Appear pro hac vice by Lucy J. Wheatley. Fee $100 receipt number AAREDC-4322027. Filed by Boot Barn Inc (Griffin, William) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Appear pro hac vice by Amanda L. DeFord. Fee $100 receipt number AAREDC-4321874. Filed by Boot Barn Inc (Griffin, William) |
| Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION to Extend Time to File Answer or Responsive Pleading by Boot Barn Inc (Griffin, William) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by Boot Barn Inc (Griffin, William) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by William M. Griffin, III on behalf of Boot Barn Inc (Griffin, William) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand and Request for Permanent Injunction against Boot Barn Inc, filed by Cody James. Summons issued and returned to counsel. (Fee of $402 paid. Receipt Number LIT087529.) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jbh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: James v. Boot Barn Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Cody James | |
| Represented By: | Mark Murphey Henry |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Boot Barn Inc | |
| Represented By: | Amanda L. DeFord |
| Represented By: | Jason W. Cook |
| Represented By: | Lucy Jewett Wheatley |
| Represented By: | Thomas Joseph Gohn |
| Represented By: | William M. Griffin, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
