Smith v. Rogers et al
Plaintiff: Antonio Smith
Defendant: Aaron Rogers, Keith Waddle, Shurika Bown, William Straughn, John Moss, Raymond Naylor and Dexter Payne
Case Number: 4:2022cv00681
Filed: July 25, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: Jerome T Kearney
Referring Judge: Billy Roy Wilson
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 15, 2022 Filing 11 APPELLATE FILING FEE NOTICE to Plaintiff. (jbh)
September 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 JUDGMENT: Based on the #9 order entered today, this case is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 9/15/2022. (jbh)
September 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER adopting #5 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition in all respects; dismissing this case without prejudice for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted; denying #6 motion to appoint counsel as moot; counting dismissal as a "strike"; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from any Order adopting these recommendations and accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 9/15/2022. (jbh)
September 15, 2022 Filing 8 OBJECTION to #5 Report and Recommendations by Antonio Smith. (kdr)
September 15, 2022 Filing 7 REQUEST for Production of Documents by Antonio Smith.(kdr)
September 15, 2022 Filing 6 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Antonio Smith. (kdr)
September 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted; recommending that this dismissal count as a "strike"; and recommending that the Court certify that an in forma pauperis appeal from any Order adopting these recommendations and accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Objections due within 14 days of this Recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 9/8/2022. (ldb)
August 8, 2022 Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Antonio Smith.(kdr)
August 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER granting #1 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; directing monthly payments be made from Plaintiff's prison trust account for the $350 filing fee; directing the Clerk to forward a copy of this Order to the Warden of the Grimes Unit of the ADC, the ADC Trust Fund Centralized Banking Office, and the ADC Compliance Office; directing the Plaintiff to submit an Amended Complaint for the Court's review within 30 days from the date of this Order, if he wishes; and directing the Clerk of Court to mail Plaintiff a blank 42 U.S.C. 1983 Complaint form. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 8/1/2022. (ldb) (Docket text modified on 8/1/2022 to correct a typographical error) (jak)
July 26, 2022 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Antonio Smith. (llg)
July 25, 2022 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Antonio Smith. (llg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Rogers et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Antonio Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aaron Rogers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Keith Waddle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shurika Bown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William Straughn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Moss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Raymond Naylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dexter Payne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?