Samuels v. University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff et al
Plaintiff: Temeka D Samuels
Defendant: University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff, Christopher Peterson and Christopher Robinson
Case Number: 4:2022cv00803
Filed: September 6, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: Lee P Rudofsky
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 27, 2022 Filing 9 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #8 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Christopher Peterson, Christopher Robinson, University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff. (Curran, David)
October 27, 2022 Filing 8 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings by Christopher Peterson, Christopher Robinson, University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff (Curran, David)
October 27, 2022 Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Christopher Peterson, Christopher Robinson, University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 (Letter Re Termination from HR), #2 Exhibit 2 (Samuels' Email Re Termination), #3 Exhibit 3 (EEOC Charge))(Curran, David)
October 27, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by David A. Curran on behalf of Christopher Peterson, Christopher Robinson, University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff (Curran, David)
October 4, 2022 Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Christopher Peterson by Temeka D Samuels. (Dodson, Kimberly)
October 4, 2022 Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Christopher Robinson by Temeka D Samuels. (Dodson, Kimberly)
October 4, 2022 Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff by Temeka D Samuels. (Dodson, Kimberly)
September 6, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance on behalf of Temeka D Samuels, by Kimberly Dodson. (ldb)
September 6, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Temeka D Samuels against All Defendants. (Fee $402, Receipt Number LIT088177.) No summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (ldb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Samuels v. University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Temeka D Samuels
Represented By: Kimberly Dodson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff
Represented By: David A. Curran
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christopher Peterson
Represented By: David A. Curran
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christopher Robinson
Represented By: David A. Curran
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?