Warnock v. Capital City Traffic Control LLC et al
Plaintiff: Dustin Warnock
Defendant: Capital City Traffic Control LLC and Jay Muniz
Case Number: 4:2022cv00869
Filed: September 20, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: Lee P Rudofsky
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #9 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Lydia Hicks Hamlet terminated. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 11/18/2022. (hml)
November 18, 2022 Filing 9 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney -Lydia H. Hamlet by Dustin Warnock (Hamlet, Lydia)
November 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #7 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to #4 Plaintiff's First Amended and Substituted Complaint. Response due by 12/12/2022. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 11/18/2022. (hml)
November 17, 2022 Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #4 Amended Complaint by All Defendants (Taylor, Brett)
October 31, 2022 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dustin Warnock. Jay Muniz served on 10/30/2022. (Sanford, Joshua)
October 31, 2022 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dustin Warnock. Capital City Traffic Control LLC served on 10/30/2022. (Sanford, Joshua)
October 5, 2022 Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT -- First Amended and Substituted Complaint against All Defendants, filed by Dustin Warnock(Sanford, Joshua)
September 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER approving #2 Plaintiff's Notice of Related Case. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 9/29/2022. (hml)
September 20, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE of Related Case by Dustin Warnock; Case Number 4:19-cv-813-LPR. (ldb)
September 20, 2022 Filing 1 ORIGINAL COMPLAINT filed by Dustin Warnock against Capital City Traffic Control LLC and Jay Muniz. ( Fee $ 402, Receipt Number LIT088365.) Summons issued and returned to counsel. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (ldb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Warnock v. Capital City Traffic Control LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dustin Warnock
Represented By: Joshua Sanford
Represented By: Lydia Hicks Hamlet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Capital City Traffic Control LLC
Represented By: Brett Wesley Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jay Muniz
Represented By: Brett Wesley Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?