Brinkley et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
| Phyl R Brinkley and Deborah L Brinkley |
| State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company |
| 4:2022cv00945 |
| September 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Brian S Miller |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #5 Motion to Dismiss (Partial) filed by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Runyon, Emily) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss (PARTIAL) by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (Runyon, Emily) |
| Filing 4 PARTIAL ANSWER to #2 Complaint with Jury Demand by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Runyon, Emily) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (ldb) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Phyl R Brinkley and Deborah L Brinkley against State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (ldb) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company from Saline County Circuit Court, case number 63CV-22-943-3. Fee $402, receipt number LIT088467. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (ldb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
