Elliott v. Payne
Matthew Ryan Elliott |
Dexter Payne |
4:2022cv00947 |
September 29, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Edie R Ervin |
Patricia S Harris |
James M Moody |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Respondent Dexter Payne has filed the pending motion for extension of time. For good cause shown, the motion is granted. Respondent is given up, and including, December 16, 2022, to file an answer, motion, or other response to the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed by petitioner Matthew Ryan Elliott. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 11/10/2022. (jfc) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Dexter Payne (Luebke, Joseph) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph Karl Luebke on behalf of Dexter Payne (Luebke, Joseph) |
Filing 7 ORDER directing the Clerk of the Court to serve, by regular mail, a copy of #2 Elliott's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and this Order on respondent Dexter Payne and the Attorney General for the State of Arkansas; and directing the Respondent to file an answer, motion, or other response to Elliott's petition within 21 days after service of the petition, exclusive of the day of service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 10/21/2022. (llg) |
Filing 6 Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number LIT088673. (kth) |
Filing 5 ORDER denying #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; giving Elliott up to, and including, 11/4/2022, to pay the five dollar filing fee; and denying #3 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 10/4/2022. (ldb) |
Filing 4 ORDER: I must recuse from this case. The Clerk of the Court is directed to randomly reassign this case to another magistrate judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin on 10/3/2022. (jbh) |
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT. Based on #4 Order, the Clerk's office has reassigned the referral Magistrate Judge in this case to Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris. (jak) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Matthew Ryan Elliott. (ldb) |
Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Matthew Ryan Elliott. (ldb) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Matthew Ryan Elliott. (ldb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Elliott v. Payne | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Matthew Ryan Elliott | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Dexter Payne | |
Represented By: | Joseph Karl Luebke |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.