Simms v. Cental Intelligence Agency et al
| Franklin Shane Simms |
| Central Intelligence Agency, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Wells Fargo Bank, Wells Fargo, Capitol One and Bank of America |
| 4:2022cv00955 |
| October 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| James M Moody |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Other Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER denying #5 request because there are no exceptional circumstances here that would justify relief. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 10/25/2022. (llg)
|
| Filing 5 RESPONSE to #3 Order to Dismiss filed by Franklin Shane Simms. (fjg) |
|
Filing 4
JUDGMENT: Consistent with #3 Order entered on this day, this case is hereby dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 10/11/2022. (llg)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #1 Mr. Simms's motion to proceed in forma pauperis; dismissing, without prejudice, #2 Complaint; and certifying an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 10/11/2022. (llg)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Franklin Shane Simms. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (llg) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Franklin Shane Simms. (llg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
