Cotton v. Department of Veterans Affairs
| Eloise Cotton |
| Denis R McDonough and Department of Veterans Affairs |
| 4:2022cv00968 |
| October 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Lee P Rudofsky |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12111 American Disability Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Arkansas, Jonathan D. Ross, filed by Eloise Cotton. (Rasch, Sydney) |
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Service U.S. Attorney General, Merrick B. Garland, filed by Eloise Cotton. (Rasch, Sydney) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Eloise Cotton. Department of Veterans Affairs served on 10/17/2022. (Rasch, Sydney) |
| NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #1 Complaint. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified to indicate the document is filed against the Department of Veterans Affairs. (cmn) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Eloise Cotton against Department of Veterans Affairs. (Fee $ 402, Receipt Number LIT088582.) Summons issued and returned to counsel. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (ldb) (Docket text modified on 10/11/2022 to correct party name.)(cmn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
