Leflar v. Michaels Stores Inc
| Sarah Leflar |
| Michaels Stores Inc |
| 4:2022cv00990 |
| October 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| James M Moody |
| Billy Roy Wilson |
| Contract: Other |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER denying without prejudice #6 Plaintiff's Motion to Remand and #4 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. This case is STAYED until the Eighth Circuit issues a ruling in Robert Leflar v. Target Corporation, 4:22-cv-00727. After that case is resolved on appeal, the parties must file a motion to lift stay and may refile their motions. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 11/10/22. (dmm)
|
| Filing 16 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Conference to occur by 1/17/2023. Rule 26(f) Report due by 1/30/2023. Jury Trial set for 2/6/2024 at 9:30 AM in Little Rock Courtroom # A401 before Judge Billy Roy Wilson. Entered at the direction of the Court on 11/7/22. (mmb) |
| Filing 15 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT. Pursuant to #14 Order, the Clerk's office has reassigned the case to Judge Billy Roy Wilson. (jak) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER originally filed in case 4:22-cv-00686 KGB directing the Clerk of Court to transfer immediately the case, and all cases listed on Courts Exhibit A attached hereto, to Judge Wilson. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 11/4/2022. (jak)
|
| Filing 13 RESPONSE in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Michaels Stores Inc. (Watson, Noah) |
| Filing 12 REPLY to Response to Motion re #4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM DEFENDANT MICHAELS STORES, INC.'S REPLY IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO DISMISS filed by Michaels Stores Inc. (Chiles, E.) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE in Opposition re #4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Sarah Leflar. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Slade, David) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #8 and #9 motions to admit counsel pro hac vice on behalf of Defendant; and admitting Michael J. Burns and Jeremy Schachter to appear before this Court as co-counsel of record in this action. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 10/25/2022. (llg)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Appear pro hac vice by Jeremy Schachter. Fee $100 receipt number AAREDC-4378969. Filed by Michaels Stores Inc (Watson, Noah) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Appear pro hac vice by Michael J. Burns. Fee $100 receipt number AAREDC-4378968. Filed by Michaels Stores Inc (Watson, Noah) |
| Filing 7 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #6 Remand to State Court filed by Sarah Leflar. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Slade, David) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Sarah Leflar (Slade, David) |
| Filing 5 BRIEF IN SUPPORT of #4 Motion to Dismiss filed by Michaels Stores Inc. (llg) |
| Filing 4 MOTION TO DISMISS by Michaels Stores Inc. (llg) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by Michaels Stores Inc. (llg) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Michaels Stores Inc filed by Sarah Leflar. (llg) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Michaels Stores Inc from Lonoke County Circuit Court, case number 43CV-22-00494. Filing Fee of $402 paid, receipt number LIT088628. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (llg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
