Delancey et al v. AGCO Corporation et al
| Jerry Delancey and Bonnie Delancey |
| AGCO Corporation and John Doe |
| 4:2022cv01037 |
| October 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| D P Marshall |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Peyton Caroline Watts on behalf of AGCO Corporation (Watts, Peyton) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by AGCO Corporation.(Atchley, Russell) |
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons , filed by Jerry Delancey, Bonnie Delancey. AGCO Corporation served on 11/7/2022. (McDaniel, Brett) |
| Summons Reissued as to AGCO Corporation and returned to counsel for service. (fjg) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #1 Complaint. CORRECTION: The Civil Cover Sheet was not added during docketing due to a clerical mistake by the Clerk's office. The document was added to #1 and hereto for service/review by the parties. (kbc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Jerry Delancey and Bonnie Delancey against AGCO Corporation and John Doe. (Fee $402, Receipt Number LIT088797.) Summons issued and returned to counsel. (ldb) Additional attachment added on 10/27/2022: #1 Civil Cover Sheet. (kbc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
