Hollis v. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency et al
| Kelly Ray Hollis, III |
| Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and Air Force Research Lab |
| 4:2022cv01042 |
| October 28, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Kristine G Baker |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 RESPONSE to #5 Order to Show Cause filed by Kelly Ray Hollis, III. (fjg) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE by Kelly Ray Hollis, III re #4 MOTION for Order. (jap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE by Kelly Ray Hollis, III re #3 Jury Demand. (jap) |
Filing 5
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE granting #1 motion to proceed in forma pauperis; directing Mr. Hollis to show cause within 30 days from the entry of this Order why his case should not be dismissed for failure to show that proper presentment of his case was made prior to filing this lawsuit; and reserving ruling on #4 motion to amend at this time. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 12/12/2022. (jbh)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION by Kelly Ray Hollis, III. (jap) |
| Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury filed by Kelly Ray Hollis, III. (fjg) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Air Force Research Lab, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, filed by Kelly Ray Hollis, III. (jbh) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kelly Ray Hollis, III. (jbh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
