Hales v. Wakefield et al
| Nathan Hale and Nathan Hales |
| Robert Wakefield, M Dukes and Bowers |
| 4:2022cv01078 |
| November 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Lee P Rudofsky |
| Joe J Volpe |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER granting Plaintiff's IFP Application #1 . The Clerk shall mail a copy of this order to the Lonoke County Detention Facility Jail Administrator. The Clerk shall mail a 42 U.S.C. 1983 complaint form (but not an IFP Application or Calculation Sheet) to Plaintiff with a copy of this order. If Plaintiff wishes to amend the complaint, he must complete the new complaint form in its entirety in accordance with this order, label it an "Amended Complaint," and file it within 30 days of the date of this order. Plaintiff's complaint, as it now stands, is partially deficient and some of his claims may be dismissed after 30 days of the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 12/8/2022. (lej)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Nathan Hale.(kdr) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Nathan Hale. (kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
