Mathis v. Hawkins
| Catherine C Mathis |
| Bureau of Prisons and Tonya Hawkins |
| 4:2022cv01276 |
| December 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Lee P Rudofsky |
| Joe J Volpe |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Catherine C Mathis re #5 Consent Notice. (jbh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE, CONSENT AND REFERENCE to a Magistrate Judge forwarded by the Clerk of Court. (lej) |
| Filing 4 RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Tonya Hawkins.(Smith, Shannon) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Shannon S. Smith on behalf of Tonya Hawkins (Smith, Shannon) |
Filing 2
ORDER directing the Clerk of the Court to serve a copy of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and this Order on the respondent and the U.S. Attorney by regular mail. Respondent shall file an answer, motion, or other pleading responsive to the Petition within 40 days after service of the Petition, exclusive of the day of service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 1/5/2023. (lej)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Catherine C Mathis. Filing fee of $ 5 paid. Receipt No. LIT374. No Summons issued. (kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
