Howard v. Bruner
| Cody S Howard |
| Bruner |
| 4:2023cv00020 |
| January 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| J Thomas Ray |
| Lee P Rudofsky |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 APPELLATE FILING FEE NOTICE to Plaintiff. (ldb) |
Filing 9
JUDGMENT: Consistent with #8 Order, this case is hereby dismissed without prejudice. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Judgment or the accompanying Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 3/3/2023. (ldb)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER dismissing, without prejudice, #2 Complaint; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from the Order and Judgment dismissing this action would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 3/3/2023. (ldb)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Filing of Calculation Sheet and Certificate of Prisoner Accounts by Cody S Howard. (ldb) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Proceed by Cody S Howard. (kdr) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Cody S Howard. (jbh) |
|
Filing 4
INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONERS directing the Clerk to send Plaintiff another IFP Application, including the necessary certificate of inmate trust account and calculation sheet, along with a copy of this Order; directing Plaintiff to either: (1) pay the $402 filing fee; or (2) have an authorized jail official complete and sign both the certificate of inmate trust account and the calculation sheet, and return these signed forms to the Clerk, along with the IFP Application, providing additional information about Plaintiff's trust fund, including the value of it, and what the funds can be used for within 30 days-on or before 02/09/2023; directing the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to the Jail Administrator of the Pulaski County Detention Facility ("PCDF"); and directing the PCDF Jail Administrator to have an authorized PCDF official complete and sign the forms with the appropriate information from Howard's PCDF trust account and promptly return the signed and completed documents to Howard, so that he may timely file them with the Court, within the 30 day period. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 01/10/2023. (llg)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE to the Court by Cody S Howard. (kdr) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Bruner, filed by Cody S Howard.(kdr) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Cody S Howard. (kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Howard v. Bruner | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Cody S Howard | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Bruner | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
