Shaddon v. Dardanelle & Russellville Railroad Company
Plaintiff: Garrett Shaddon
Defendant: Dardanelle & Russellville Railroad Company
Case Number: 4:2023cv00056
Filed: January 26, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: Kristine G Baker
Nature of Suit: Federal Employer's Liability
Cause of Action: 45 U.S.C. ยง 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 23, 2023 Filing 9 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Conference to occur by 5/22/2023; Rule 26(f) Report due by 6/5/2023; Jury Trial set for sometime during the week of 4/29/2024 at 09:00 AM in Little Rock Courtroom # 4D before Judge Kristine G. Baker. Signed at the direction of the Court on 03/23/2023. (tmw)
March 20, 2023 Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Appear pro hac vice by Colin X. Fitzgerald. Fee $100 receipt number AAREDC-4479486. Filed by Garrett Shaddon (Groves, Steven)
March 9, 2023 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Garrett Shaddon. Dardanelle & Russellville Railroad Company served on 2/15/2023. (Groves, Steven)
March 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #4 , #5 motions to admit Mr. Williams and Mr. Teel pro hac vice. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 3/3/2023. (jbh)
March 3, 2023 Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Appear pro hac vice by Al Foster Teel. Fee $100 receipt number AAREDC-4467644. Filed by Dardanelle & Russellville Railroad Company (Attachments: #1 Declaration in Support of Motion of Al Foster Teel)(Meyer, Christopher)
March 3, 2023 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Appear pro hac vice by Turner B. Williams. Fee $100 receipt number AAREDC-4467634. Filed by Dardanelle & Russellville Railroad Company (Attachments: #1 Declaration in Support of Motion of Turner B Williams)(Meyer, Christopher)
March 1, 2023 Filing 3 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Dardanelle & Russellville Railroad Company.(Meyer, Christopher)
March 1, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher Daniel Meyer on behalf of Dardanelle & Russellville Railroad Company (Meyer, Christopher)
February 3, 2023 Summons Issued as to Dardanelle & Russellville Railroad Company and returned via mail to counsel for plaintiff. (jap)
January 26, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Dardanelle & Russellville Railroad Company, filed by Garrett Shaddon. Summons issued and returned to counsel. (Fee of $402 paid. Receipt Number LIT750.) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jbh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shaddon v. Dardanelle & Russellville Railroad Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Garrett Shaddon
Represented By: Steven L. Groves
Represented By: Colin X. Fitzgerald
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dardanelle & Russellville Railroad Company
Represented By: Al F. Teel
Represented By: Turner B. Williams
Represented By: Christopher Daniel Meyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?