Dybalski v. Smith et al
| Garrett H Dybalski |
| Daisy Smith, Karen Ghromley and Cameron Shelton |
| 4:2023cv00100 |
| February 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| J Thomas Ray |
| Lee P Rudofsky |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Garrett H Dybalski re #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #2 Complaint. (fjg) |
| Filing 6 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Garrett H Dybalski re #3 Order, Docket Note. (jbh) |
| Filing 5 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Garrett H Dybalski re #4 E-mail received from Western District of Arkansas. (fjg) |
| Filing 4 E-MAIL received from Western District of Arkansas, confirming the case was received and opened in their district as case number 4:23-cv-04011. (cmn) |
Filing 3
TRANSFER ORDER directing that this case is immediately transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 2/10/2023. (kdr)
|
| Docket Note: Case electronically transferred to United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas on this date. (kdr) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Garrett H Dybalski.(kdr) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Garrett H Dybalski. (kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
