Hebrard v. Lewis et al
Nicholas Hebrard |
Regina Lewis, Robert Brown and Roderick Daniels |
4:2023cv00123 |
February 13, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
D P Marshall |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #4 Order. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified to indicate the denial of #3 Motion is without prejudice as marked on the Order. (jak) |
Filing 4 ORDER denying without prejudice #3 Hebrard's application to proceed in forma pauperis; directing Hebrard to submit a completed application and certified calculation sheet by 05/12/2023; and directing the Clerk to mail him an in forma pauperis application with a copy of this Order. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 04/12/2023. (llg) (Docket text modified on 4/13/2023 to correct the description of the document filed) (jak) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Nicholas Hebrard. (kdr) |
Filing 2 ORDER directing Hebrard to pay the $402 filing and administrative fees or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis by 3/24/2023. The Court directs the Clerk to mail Hebrard and application to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 2/22/2023. (jak) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Nicholas Hebrard. (ldb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.