American Inter-Fidelity Exchange v. Sandhu et al
| American Inter-Fidelity Exchange |
| Delancy Madkins, Harjit S Sandhu, T & J Trucking Service Inc, Delancey Madkins and Diamond Transportation Inc |
| 4:2023cv00205 |
| March 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Billy Roy Wilson |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by American Inter-Fidelity Exchange (Shirley, Alex) |
| Filing 2 Deficiency Letter from Clerk of Court re #1 Complaint notifying party that a Corporate Disclosure Statement was not filed with first appearance, pleading, petition, motion response, or other request (F.R.Cv.P. 7.1). (jbh) |
| NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #1 Complaint. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified to include that summons were issued and returned to counsel for service. (jak) |
| Filing 1 ORIGINAL COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by American Inter-Fidelity Exchange. (Fee of $402 paid. Receipt Number LIT1443. Summons issued as to all Defendants and returned to counsel for service) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jbh) (Docket text modified on 3/20/2023 to include that summons were issued) (jak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
