Stickley v. Geico Advantage Insurance Company
| Tara Stickley |
| Geico Advantage Insurance Company |
| 4:2023cv00212 |
| March 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Billy Roy Wilson |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 LETTER to the Clerk for the Circuit Court of Pulaski County transmitting a copy of the case file and certified copies of #11 Order to Remand and the docket sheet via certified mail. (jbh) |
Filing 11
ORDER granting #9 Motion to Remand; and directing the Clerk of the Court to immediately remand this case to the Circuit Court of Pulaski County, Arkansas. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 4/12/2023. (jbh)
|
| Filing 10 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #9 Remand to State Court filed by Tara Stickley. (McEnerney, Eric) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Tara Stickley (McEnerney, Eric) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to #7 Amended Complaint with Jury Demand by Geico Advantage Insurance Company.(Hornung, Nicholas) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FED R. CIV. P. 15 (1) (B) with Jury Demand against Geico Advantage Insurance Company, filed by Tara Stickley(McEnerney, Eric) |
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by Geico Advantage Insurance Company (Ogles, William) |
| Filing 5 Deficiency Letter from Clerk of Court re #1 Notice of Removal notifying party that a Corporate Disclosure Statement was not filed with first appearance, pleading, petition, motion response, or other request (F.R.Cv.P. 7.1). (jak) |
| Filing 4 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Conference to occur by 5/30/2023. Rule 26(f) Report due by 6/12/2023. Jury Trial set for 3/26/2024 at 9:30 AM in Little Rock Courtroom # A401 before Judge Billy Roy Wilson. Entered at the direction of the Court on 3/21/23. (mmb) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to #2 Complaint with Jury Demand by Geico Advantage Insurance Company. (jbh) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Geico Advantage Insurance Company, filed by Tara Stickley. (jbh) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Geico Advantage Insurance Company from Pulaski County Circuit Court, case number 60CV-23-00694. Fee of $402 paid; receipt number LIT1466. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jbh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stickley v. Geico Advantage Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tara Stickley | |
| Represented By: | Eric McEnerney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Geico Advantage Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Nicholas Daniel Hornung |
| Represented By: | William Johnson Ogles |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
