Moore v. Proctor et al
Plaintiff: Johnny Ray Moore, Sr
Defendant: Willard Proctor, Jr, Paul Worthy, Brimley and Alice Abyson
Case Number: 4:2023cv00302
Filed: March 28, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: James M Moody
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 22, 2023 Filing 8 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Johnny Ray Moore, Sr re #4 Order, #5 Judgment. (fjg)
May 19, 2023 Filing 7 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Johnny Ray Moore, Sr re #6 Appellate Filing Fee Notice. (fjg)
May 8, 2023 Filing 6 APPELLATE FILING FEE NOTICE to Plaintiff. (llg)
May 8, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 JUDGMENT: Consistent with #4 Order entered on this day, this case is hereby dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 05/08/2023. (llg)
May 8, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #1 Moore's motion to proceed IFP; assessing an initial partial filing fee of $6.45; directing the initial partial filing fee and monthly payments be made from Plaintiff's inmate trust account for the $350 filing fee; directing the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to the Administrator of the Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility; dismissing, without prejudice, Moore's complaint; recommending dismissal count as a "strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. 1915(g); and certifying an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 05/08/2023. (llg)
April 24, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE of Address by Johnny Ray Moore, Sr. (llg)
March 28, 2023 Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Johnny Ray Moore, Sr.(kdr)
March 28, 2023 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Johnny Ray Moore, Sr. (kdr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moore v. Proctor et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Johnny Ray Moore, Sr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Willard Proctor, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Paul Worthy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brimley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alice Abyson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?