Morris v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
Jonathan Morris |
Arkansas Department of Correction and Faulkner, County of |
4:2023cv00303 |
March 28, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
James M Moody |
J Thomas Ray |
Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 MOTION to Amend #2 Complaint, MOTION for Copies, and MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Jonathan Morris. (ldb) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Jonathan Morris. (kdr) |
Filing 4 INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONERS granting #1 IFP Motion; directing monthly payments be collected from Plaintiff's institutional account until a total of $350 has been paid; and directing the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to the Warden of the Cummins Unit and the appropriate ADC offices. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 3/31/2023. (kdr) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #2 Complaint. CORRECTION: The original document was submitted in error (wrong image file) due to a clerical mistake by the Clerk's office. The correct document was added to #2 and hereto for service/review by the parties. (kbc) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Jonathan Morris. (ldb) Additional attachment added on 3/29/2023: #1 Main Document - Correct. (kbc) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jonathan Morris. (ldb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.