Hanan v. Overlook Partners LLC et al
Jakie Hanan |
Overlook Partners LLC doing business as Steep Hill Arkansas, Brandon Thornton, Brent Whittington, Bold Team LLC, NSMC-OPCO LLC doing business as Natural State Medicinal, Osage Creek Cultivation LLC and John Does |
4:2023cv00308 |
March 31, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Brian S Miller |
Lee P Rudofsky |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting in part #26 Motion for Leave to File a Reply. Plaintiff may file one Reply of no more than ten pages that addresses its Motion to Amend, Stay, and Remand. The Reply will only be considered if it filed by May 31, 2023. No extensions will be granted. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 5/24/2023. (hml) |
Filing 27 RESPONSE to Motion re #26 MOTION for Leave to File and Motion to Extend Time to File Reply filed by Overlook Partners LLC, Brandon Thornton, Brent Whittington. (Kasten, Martin) |
NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION #26 MOTION for Leave to File. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified to correct the description of the document filed as "MOTION for Leave to File and Motion to Extend Time to File Reply by Jakie Hanan" as marked on the document. (jak) |
Filing 26 MOTION for Leave to File and Motion to Extend Time to File Reply by Jakie Hanan (Sutter, Luther)(Docket text modified on 5/11/2023 to correct the description of the document filed) (jak) |
Filing 25 RESPONSE in Opposition re #22 MOTION to Amend/Correct #2 Complaint MOTION to Stay re #11 Notice (Other), #18 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , #9 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by NSMC-OPCO LLC. (Garner, Jerry) |
Filing 24 RESPONSE to Motion re #22 MOTION to Amend/Correct #2 Complaint MOTION to Stay re #11 Notice (Other), #18 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , #9 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Overlook Partners LLC, Brandon Thornton, Brent Whittington. (Kasten, Martin) |
Filing 23 NOTICE of Appearance by Rayburn W. Green on behalf of Osage Creek Cultivation LLC (Green, Rayburn) |
Filing 22 MOTION to Amend/Correct #2 Complaint (), MOTION to Stay re #11 Notice (Other), #18 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , #9 MOTION to Dismiss , MOTION to Remand to State Court by All Plaintiffs (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Sutter, Luther) |
Filing 21 RESPONSE to Motion re #4 MOTION to Remand to State Court MOTION to Stay filed by Overlook Partners LLC, Brandon Thornton, Brent Whittington. (Kasten, Martin) |
Filing 20 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by Osage Creek Cultivation LLC (Watts, Peyton) |
Filing 19 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #18 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Osage Creek Cultivation LLC. (Watts, Peyton) |
Filing 18 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Osage Creek Cultivation LLC (Watts, Peyton) |
Filing 17 ORDER ON AMICUS BRIEFS. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 3/21/2023. (kdr) |
Filing 16 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT. Based on #15 Order, the Clerk's office has reassigned the case to Judge Lee P. Rudofsky. (jak) |
Filing 15 ORDER directing the clerk to reassign this case to Judge Lee P. Rudofsky in the interest of judicial economy because it is similar in nature and parties to Don Plumlee et al. v. Steep Hill Inc. et al., Case No. 4:22-cv-00638-LPR. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 4/11/2023. (kdr) |
Filing 14 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by NSMC-OPCO LLC (Garner, Jerry) |
Filing 13 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #12 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by NSMC-OPCO LLC. (Garner, Jerry) |
Filing 12 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by NSMC-OPCO LLC (Garner, Jerry) |
Filing 11 NOTICE by Overlook Partners LLC, Brandon Thornton, Brent Whittington re #1 Notice of Removal Supplement of State Court Filings (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 01, #2 Exhibit 02, #3 Exhibit 03, #4 Exhibit 04, #5 Exhibit 05, #6 Exhibit 06, #7 Exhibit 07, #8 Exhibit 08, #9 Exhibit 09, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13)(Kasten, Martin) |
Filing 10 BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #9 Motion to Dismiss filed by Overlook Partners LLC, Brandon Thornton, Brent Whittington. (Kasten, Martin) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss by Overlook Partners LLC, Brandon Thornton, Brent Whittington (Kasten, Martin) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Related Case by Overlook Partners LLC, Brandon Thornton, Brent Whittington; Case Number 4:22-CV-638 (Kasten, Martin) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Jerry D. Garner on behalf of NSMC-OPCO LLC (Garner, Jerry) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Robbin Shumon Rahman on behalf of NSMC-OPCO LLC (Rahman, Robbin) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph Cotten Cunningham on behalf of NSMC-OPCO LLC (Cunningham, Joseph) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Remand to State Court (), MOTION to Stay by All Plaintiffs (Sutter, Luther) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by Overlook Partners LLC. (kdr) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Jakie Hanan.(kdr) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Overlook Partners LLC, Brandon Thornton and Brent Whittington from Pulaski County Circuit Court, Case Number 60CV-23-1393. Filing Fee of $402 paid. Receipt Number LIT1590. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.