Daniels v. Holman et al
| Michael Daniels |
| Adam B Holman and Joe Page |
| 4:2023cv00345 |
| April 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| J Thomas Ray |
| Lee P Rudofsky |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #3 Mr. Daniels's Motion for Status Update; directing the Clerk of Court to send Daniels an Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit; directing the Clerk of Court to send Daniels a blank 28 U.S.C. 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; directing Daniels to, on or before 6/2/2023, either: (a) file the completed IFP motion; or (b) pay the $5 filing fee, in full, if he wishes to continue with this action; and directing Daniels to, on or before 6/2/2023: (a) fully complete the applicable sections of the 28 U.S.C. 2254 Petition (Form AO-241); (b) sign and date the form on the applicable page; and (c) file the completed and signed form with the Court. Service is not appropriate at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 5/3/2023. (kdr)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Status Update by Michael Daniels. (ldb) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER ON AMICUS BRIEFS. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 3/21/2023. (ldb)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Michael Daniels. (ldb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
