Cox v. Wakefeild et al
| Joe Dean Cox, II |
| Normon Wakefeild, Ray Hodds and Dextor Payna |
| 4:2023cv00390 |
| April 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| James M Moody |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 APPELLATE FILING FEE NOTICE to Plaintiff. (jbh) |
Filing 4
JUDGMENT: Consistent with the #3 Order that was entered on this day, this case is hereby dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 5/8/2023. (jbh)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #1 motion to proceed in forma pauperis; directing monthly payments be made from Plaintiff's prison trust account for the $350 filing fee; directing the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to the Warden of the Ouachita River Unit, the ADC Trust Fund Centralized Banking Office, and the ADC Compliance Office; dismissing Cox's claims without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; counting this dismissal as a "strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. 1915(g); and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 5/8/2023. (jbh)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Joe Dean Cox, II. (llg) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Joe Dean Cox, II. (llg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
