Walker Jones v. Arkansas Department of Health
| Natash Walker Jones and Natasha Walker Jones |
| Arkansas Department of Health |
| 4:2023cv00392 |
| April 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| James M Moody |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #5 Amended Complaint. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified to correct the party name as "Natasha Walker Jones" as indicated by the document. (cmn) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against all Defendants filed by Natasha Walker Jones.(fjg) (Docket text modified on 6/1/2023 to correct party name.)(cmn) |
Filing 4
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; and giving Ms. Jones until Monday, 05/29/2023 to file an amended complaint curing the deficiencies identified in this order. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 04/28/2023. (llg)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER provisionally granting #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, pursuant to General Order No. 29. Signed at the Direction of the Court on 04/27/2023. (llg)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT FOR EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION with Jury Demand against Arkansas Department of Health filed by Natash Walker Jones. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (llg) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Natash Walker Jones. (llg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
