Banks v. Kelley et al
| Jack Banks, III |
| Kevin Kelley, Donna Terrell, Michael Gibbons and Google Chrome |
| 4:2023cv00457 |
| May 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Billy Roy Wilson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 APPELLATE FILING FEE NOTICE to Plaintiff. (jbh) |
Filing 4
JUDGMENT: Consistent with the #3 order entered today, this case is dismissed. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 5/17/2023. (jbh)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #1 motion to proceed in forma pauperis; directing monthly payments be made from Plaintiff's prison trust account for the $350 filing fee; dismissing Plaintiff's complaint without prejudice; directing the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to the Administrator of the East Arkansas Regional Unit of the Arkansas Division of Correction; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. Dismissal of this case constitutes a "strike" within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 5/17/2023. (jbh)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Jack Banks, III. (llg) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jack Banks, III. (llg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
