Ruiz v. Does
Tony M Ruiz |
Does Unknown Staff, Officers, COs, Lts., Sgts. Jail Administrator, Medical and Personnel, Pope County Jail/Pope County Sheriff |
4:2023cv00512 |
June 2, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Patricia S Harris |
Lee P Rudofsky |
Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting #12 Motion to Extend Time. Plaintiff Ruiz is granted an additional 30 days to file his amended complaint. Amended complaint due no later than August 28, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 7/24/2023. (cfd) |
Filing 12 MOTION to Extend Time by Tony M Ruiz. (kdr) |
Filing 11 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER denying #10 Motion to Appoint Counsel. A civil litigant does not have a constitutional or statutory right to appointed counsel in a civil action but the Court may appoint counsel at its discretion. 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(1). The Court has considered plaintiff's need for an attorney, the likelihood that plaintiff will benefit from assistance of counsel, the factual complexity of the case, the plaintiff's ability to investigate and present his case, and the complexity of the legal issues. In considering these factors, the Court finds that plaintiff's claims do not appear legally or factually complex, and it appears he is capable of prosecuting his claims without appointed counsel at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 7/12/2023. (cfd) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Tony M Ruiz. (ldb) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting #7 application to proceed in forma pauperis; directing monthly payments be made from Plaintiff's prison trust account for the $350 filing fee; directing the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to the Warden of the Varner Supermax Unit, the ADC Trust Fund Centralization Bank Office, and the ADC Compliance Office, and a blank 1983 complaint form to Ruiz; and directing Ruiz to file an amended complaint conforming to this order within 30 days from the date of this Order. In the event he fails to file an amended complaint by that date, some or all of Ruiz's claims may be dismissed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 06/27/2023. (llg) |
Filing 8 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER denying #6 Motion to Compel. Discovery requests and responses are not to be filed with the Court -- but, instead, should be sent directly to opposing counsel, along with a certificate of service. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d) (providing that "the following discovery requests and responses must not be filed until they are used in the proceeding or the court orders filing: (i) depositions, (ii) interrogatories, (iii) requests for documents or to permit entry upon the land, and (iv) requests for admissions"); See also Local Rule 5.5(c)(2)(stating that "[a]ny party proceeding pro se shall be expected to be familiar with and follow the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure"). In contrast, motions to compel and/or for sanctions, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37, and any necessary attachments will be accepted for filing. Discovery may not be conducted until defendants are served and have answered; service has not been ordered on defendants in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 06/27/2023. (dml) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tony M Ruiz. (ldb) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Compel by Tony M Ruiz. (ldb) |
Filing 5 NOTICE by Tony M Ruiz. (ldb) |
Filing 4 ORDER ON AMICUS BRIEFS. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 3/21/2023. (kdr) |
Filing 3 INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER PLAINTIFFS denying #1 application to proceed IFP because it is incomplete; directing the Clerk of Court to enclose an IFP application along with a copy of this order; and directing Plaintiff to return a completed IFP application, along with your certificate and calculation of initial payment of filing fee signed by a prison official, or pay the $402.00 filing and administrative fees within 30 days of the date of this order. Otherwise, the lawsuit will be dismissed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 06/05/2023. (llg) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Does, filed by Tony M Ruiz.(kdr) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tony M Ruiz. (kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ruiz v. Does | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Tony M Ruiz | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Does Unknown Staff, Officers, COs, Lts., Sgts. Jail Administrator, Medical and Personnel, Pope County Jail/Pope County Sheriff | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.