Romhilt v. Watt et al
| Jon Romhilt |
| Ashley, Edwards and Ashley Watt |
| 4:2023cv00575 |
| June 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| J Thomas Ray |
| Billy Roy Wilson |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 NOTICE, CONSENT AND REFERENCE to a Magistrate Judge forwarded by the Clerk of Court. (csf) |
Filing 17
SCHEDULING ORDER: Defendants may file a dispositive motion on the issue of exhaustion on or before 9/14/2023, and a separate Statement of Facts. Discovery is stayed until the exhaustion issue is decided. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 8/15/2023. (csf)
|
| Filing 16 ANSWER to #7 Amended Complaint with Jury Demand by Ashley Watt.(Drennon, Baxter) |
| Filing 15 SUMMONS Returned Executed. Ashley Watt served on 7/24/2023. (ajj) |
| Filing 14 ANSWER to #2 Complaint with Jury Demand by Edwards.(Mosley, Michael) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Allen Mosley on behalf of Edwards (Mosley, Michael) |
| Filing 12 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Jon Romhilt re #3 Order, #4 Initial Order for Pro Se Prisoners, #5 Order. (fjg) |
| Filing 11 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Jon Romhilt re #7 Amended Complaint, #8 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (fjg) |
| Filing 10 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Jon Romhilt re #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #2 Complaint. Resent to updated address. (fjg) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed. Edwards served on 7/17/2023. (ajj) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jon Romhilt. (ldb) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Jon Romhilt. (ldb) |
| Filing 6 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Jon Romhilt re #3 Order, #4 Initial Order for Pro Se Prisoners, #5 Order. (fjg) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER directing the Clerk of Court to update the docket sheet to reflect Defendant Ashley Watt's full name and to issue a summons for Defendant Watt; and directing the United States Marshal to serve the summons, #2 Complaint, #3 Court's screening Order, and this Order on Defendant Watt through Turn Key General Counsel, Austin Young without prepayment of fee and costs or security therefor. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 06/29/2023. (llg)
|
| Summons Issued as to Ashley Watt and forwarded to the United States Marshal for service. (llg) |
|
Filing 4
INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONERS granting Romhilt's IFP Motion; directing monthly payments be collected from Plaintiff's institutional account until a total of $350 has been paid; and directing the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to the Jail Administrator of the White County Detention Center. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 6/27/2023. (kdr)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER directing the Clerk to prepare summonses for Defendant Edwards; directing the USMS to serve the summons, #2 Complaint, and this Order on Edwards at the White County Detention Center, without prepayment of fees or costs. Service for Turn Key employee, Defendant Ashley, will be directed by separate order. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 6/27/2023. (kdr)
|
| Summons Issued as to Edwards. Forwarded to USMS for service. (kdr) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Jon Romhilt. (llg) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jon Romhilt. (llg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
