Branson v. LL Glenn Road LLC et al
William Branson |
LL Glenn Road LLC and Luther Family Holdings Limited |
4:2023cv00583 |
June 21, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
James M Moody |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER:Rule 26(f) Conference to occur by 8/30/2023; Rule 26(f) Report due by 9/13/2023. Proposed Jury Trial set sometime during the week of 10/15/2024 at 9:15 AM in Little Rock Courtroom # 4A before Judge James M. Moody Jr. Signed at the Direction of the Court on 8/3/2023. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Final Scheduling Order)(kog) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by Luther Family Holdings Limited. (llg) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by LL Glenn Road LLC. (llg) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to #2 Complaint with Jury Demand by LL Glenn Road LLC, Luther Family Holdings Limited. (llg) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by William Branson. (llg) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by LL Glenn Road LLC and Luther Family Holdings Limited from Saline County Circuit Court, case number 63CV-23-00586-3. Filing Fee of $402 paid, receipt number LIT2611. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (llg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.